Okay, so the principle of investing during a recession having been established (see: PIMS Points the Way Past the Recession), what did my former company do as it came face-to-face with an imploding economy. In fact, the company was heading straight into a perfect storm: it serves the construction industry which was already well into the downturn (in some regions, the downturn looked awfully like a drain and the sucking sound we heard was usually caused by falling prices); the exchange rate was working against exports but opening the market to cheaper imports; the company is a heavy purchaser of oil-based raw materials which until recently were at historic highs; meanwhile, other commodities it purchases heavily were being gobbled up by the Chinese; new technologies were being introduced by well-heeled competitors…the list of threats was long and forbidding.

Time to yank out the PIMS database. The marketing budget was not going down without a fight. In fact, I had little trouble convincing my colleagues of the need to keep investing in marketing and product development. To my surprise, we had even less trouble convincing the Board. The issue arose with our attempt to determine the extent of this investment.

I came up with a plan to focus expenditures on winning technologies, products, markets and even specific customers. My Power of One presentation explained why we should put all our money on leadership products, first movers, consolidators and core markets. I was successful on the principles of the thing, but not the details. My colleagues were all for focusing, but to most that meant keeping the pressure up on those areas and pulling back elsewhere. Which translated not into the reallocation of funds and resources but into cutting what had now become ‘non-strategic’ investments. Hmph…here I was, hoisted on my own petard!

Seeing the Big Picture

It was useful, however, to take a broader view of things. Pulling back on the marketing spend (as I would normally define it) was offset by pushing ahead in R&D and operating efficiencies. What is Marketing in fact? Arguably, the additional investment in R&D and operations covered two of the four Ps…maybe even three. In fact, the company was about to embark on the biggest capital program in its history.

So now the marketing exercise was to get the biggest bang for the buck being spent on the ‘focus’ items and find a way to keep the rest sailing along in their slipstreams.

Remember the last post? “In down times, consumers and businesses alike look to safe havens, familiar brands and dependable suppliers that focus on delivering consistent value.” While we kept plugging away at our key focus items, all items were ceremoniously dumped in the safe haven / familiar brand / dependable supplier basket. Public relations, customer service, complaint handling, loyalty programs…all those things that make customers comfortable with a brand were tightly managed with the safe/familiar/dependable relationship in mind.

The jury is still out on how, ultimately, this strategy will work. But the company is sticking to the plan and, in fact, has returned to the black well ahead of schedule. The future looks bright…even if, right now, that future feels very far away.

Note: Our best wishes for a speedy recovery to David St Lawrence over at Making Ripples. The long-time blogger, author, artisan, community activist, gentleman and friend recently suffered a heart attack. This obviously strikes close to home, given my history. Take care of yourself, dear reader, and pay heed when your body sends you signals that something is wrong.

There are a number of excellent books on corporate strategy that merit your attention and that will provide value for your time and for a twenty. There are, of course, others not so excellent, books that at my most generous I would consider hollow in content, penned by pop authors contemptuous of their readers. Unfortunately, in business books as in so much else, popularity is not necessarily reflective of value.

There are times, however, when strategy junkies need a quicker fix than can be provided by books, good or bad. These cravings can be satisfied by reading various business magazines and blogs. Not all are of these are of equal value either and some blogs, especially, are thinly-disguised platforms for selling services and are unabashedly self-serving.

All this is to introduce a business magazine I discovered quite by accident in a store that offers for sale obscure magazines, toy soldiers and Marvel comic memorabilia. The discovery was the Spring ’08 issue of Strategy + Business. Published by Booz Allen Hamilton, the huge strategic management and technology consulting firm, Strategy + Business is – to their credit and my relief – neatly disguised and only mildly self-serving.

Interestingly, it wasn’t the feature articles that most captured my attention but the front section columns. A number of these should get you thinking :

Upturn Thinking in Downturn Years

In market downturns, the companies that emerge strongest are those that, while retrenching, push ahead with long-term strategic planning. One example of a company that did just that is Lucent; even while the telecom hardware business was in decline, CEO Patricia Russo pushed ahead with an initiative to identify new growth areas that would make use of Lucent’s core capabilities and provide stable revenue and income streams going forward.

New Metrics for Media Campaigns

The reach and frequency metrics used in assessing traditional media campaigns are losing relevance in this age of the web, social networking platforms, cell phones, PDAs, podcasts and video games. Marketers are looking to deliver “contextually relevant messages” to specific, i.e., targeted concentrations of potential customers. They are seeking more precise information on how this digital activity correlates to actual sales. As this information becomes available, they will increasingly embrace the pay-for-performance advertising model.

Undiscovered Riches in IP

In an age of commoditization and globalization, you might imagine companies would dig deep to find and exploit assets that yield sustainable differentiation. Among those assets, Intellectual Property may well be the next frontier. Companies are getting wise to the significant revenues that can be gained through patent and technology licensing. IP is moving out of the legal counsel’s office and into the corporate development arena. In fact, in the past 15 years, licensing revenues have burgeoned from $15 billion to $110 billion. To take it to the next level, companies will have to make their intellectual property both serve the business and be a business in its own right.

New Life for Tired Brands

Ford is attempting to revive the Taurus brand out of the ashes of the Five Hundred, and Proctor & Gamble is using Red Zone antiperspirants and deodorants to reposition Old Spice among teen males. Should and can old brands be revitalized? Have the attributes which once made the brands successful been eroded or been made irrelevant by competing brands? Are the products suffering from the poor opinion of its original customer base or poor awareness from new, potential customers? A proposed four-step Brand Vitality Assessment (which, no doubt, Uno Who could conduct) would provide the answers.

All in all, I rate this magazine a lucky find, one for which you might keep an eye out. You might also want to scour the back issues. Go to www.strategy-business.com. Of course, with Booz Allen Hamilton being a mega consultant, you should not expect a free lunch. Not while they’re trying to build the brand at any rate.

A few days ago, marketing maven Seth Godin made a wonderful observation: An inbound phone call is the ultimate in short-term permission. The customer or prospect is taking the time to call you. (See Who Answers the Phone?)

Every marketer has been taught about contact points, where stakeholders’ paths, direct or indirect, intersect with those of the company. It can be a trucker asking for directions, or a dealer following up on an order, or a consumer with a complaint, or a shareholder with a query. It can be opening your package or looking you up in the yellow pages. It can be reaching you – or not – on the phone, via e-mail or in person, at the door. For marketers, each point of intersection is vindication, at least, that something is working, and a valuable opportunity to make that something (and the relationship if nothing else) work better.

Too many companies underestimate – and therefore, under-resource (in manpower and funding) customer service in all its various forms. Time is money but, when it concerns customer service, the money is seen as spent rather than earned, outbound rather than inbound.

I once had a bright employee who was asked to coordinate shipments during a period of tight supply. Since we had cleaned out most of our inventory, we were operating on a just-in-time or, as we put it, on an as-needed basis. To keep all this transparent to customers, we had to keep one step ahead of them, knowing what their needs were before they did. This required constant tracking and communications, a maximum of effort and empathy for a minimum of 12 hours a day. It was reputation-making stuff and, precisely for that reason, this employee had a request – that her title did not include the words Customer Service, which would have devalued her role dramatically. When and how, I wondered, did this unfortunate devolution of customer service begin?

Branding is ultimately about how people see your company, its products and/or services. Customer service is what you do at that critical moment when people get to see your company as it really is. The two are inextricably linked. Companies that spend a ton of marketing dollars to build the brand should remember this.